Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Seeing from another's eyes

Seeing from another's eyes makes us understand what his or her feelings about things. Seeing things from others perspective or point of view, as Christine always used to say is to have empathy. Empathy is the capacity to recognise or understand another's state of mind or emotion. It is often characterized as the ability to "put oneself into another's shoes", or to in some way experience the outlook or emotions of another being within oneself. It may be described metaphorically as an emotional kind of resonance or mirroring.
In most working environment, decisions made and actions taken are without empathy. It's like when somebody is killed then only you take actions. Most things are implemented without looking at all angles and most importantly without the element of empathy. When failures, complaints or disatisfactions occur, then only one will try to think about remedial measures. In the first place, if you have given serious considerations, you don't even have to think about remedial measures.
Who's fault? Human beings by nature, have egoistic feelings and feel thier ideas are the best or some even have vested interest. As such, it blinds them from seeing from others perspectives.
It's painful to see things happening and you are part of it but helpless to do things differently. Christine is radical, she will say leave the system. I believe in living with the system and changing people's attitude to have empathy in them.
Note: No news from Christine since she left for UK. As I said in my previous entry, new environment, new friends.

People Change, Friends change

In the course our journey in life we meet all kind of people. Some become close friends, one or two even become lovers. However, as time passes by you will or have to go separate ways partly due to work or other inevitable commitments. Before going separate ways, each will promise not to forget each other. Of course, other promises will be made. But as usual as the saying goes "promises are made to be broken". Both initially will communicate alot but after sometimes slowly either one or both will seldom contact. I don't blame either party maybe they are busy. On the other hand, in the new environment they have met new friends. Me too sometimes so busy with daily work and hardly have time to contact long time friends.
So people do change? Of course, people change according to time and place. New place, new environment surely they go for new friends because they are on the same wavelength and have common things to discuss. You are not in the daily diary of them. Well, you have to accept the changes and accept to live a new life with new friends.
Note: I only remember friends who are worth remembering

Thursday, May 22, 2008

My Life - what is it

My life? what is it? All kinda things happened ....why..
50 years gone ... the story continues...

The wind is blowing... the moon is shining
Day already turned to night
Pages of life flip ....waiting to be filled with a new story
Moments of birth.... marriage.... and death
The story is three quarter gone
Only He can tell the ending

Gone through Hindusim..Christianity and now Islam
Searching for truth...
Life before birth..
Life on the earth...
Life after death.....
Only He can tell the truth

Walk through UM, UPENN, UIA and now Harvard
Acquiring Knowledge
Journey to maturity
Journey to success
Journey to excellence
Only He can value the achievement

Roaming through the night and chillness of Boston
Searching for the truth
My moments in this world...
My place in this world...
My journey in this world...
Guess truth will only surface after death...

Harvard Business School,
Boston
21/5/2008 (11.20 pm)

Back to Kuala Lumpur

After 2 months of hectic schedule - readings, discussions and lecturers in Harvard Business School, I will be back to KL on 26 May 2008. The Advanced Management Program was superb and fantastic, a total of 160 of us attended this program (including 8 of us in group 61). I have never attended a program of this nature, it's a one in lifetime experience. The background of the participants are varied from CEOs, CFOs. Senior Managers, Division Heads, VPs and Senior Government Officials. Not only the case studies and lectures discussed new ideas, methodologies and theories but more important are the views put forward by the participants based on their vast working experience and knowledge.
All these experience and knowledge will be part of me and I will disseminate to my officers, with the hope that they too benefit from the program. Re-entry after 2 months of absence, I hope won't be a great problem. I have great and capable officers who handle the work during my absence. I hope to share the knowledge gain not only with my officers and bosses but also with other senior government officials through INTAN.
Knowledge is for sharing,
Sharing will create new knowledge

Friday, May 16, 2008

Poverty vs Inequality

We had a case study on inequality and globalization. The case study provides three reasons for widening inequality in income distribution in the developed, developing and less developed economies. The reasons are globalization, techonology and government policies. Globalization had moved companies to locate their manufacturing industries where cheap labor is available such as in China, India, Brazil and other emerging economies. This resulted in displacement of jobs in the developed economies, widening the income gap, where the rich are highly educated and earning millions or even bilions per year while the poor earning much less. In US for example, those who are professional and in the financial and capital markets are the richest and those working in factories and odd jobs are poor. The Gini coefficient, a measure of income gap is widening in the US and for Malaysia too. Secondly, the techonology is displacing human with machines and robots. This is a global phenomenum and education system need to be focussed on areas where demand jobs in the labor market is high. Finally, government policies are skewed towards growth rather than equity. In less developed countries, the situation is worst, the poor are even denied the right to vote, what more self progression in life through proper education, food and health. Corruption and nepotism are the game of life over there.

Moving on, which is crucial to address poverty or inequality? I pesonally feel that for most of the developing and less developed economies the question of eradicating or reducing poverty is more pertinent than reducing the inequality gap. Millions of people still live below poverty line income and does not have or acessible to 'basic needs' such as food, water, shelter, proper sanitation, healthcare, and education. According to Netaid (Mercy Corps New York)"Each year, more than 8 million people around the world die because they are too poor to stay alive. Over 1 billion people - 1 in 6 people around the world live in extreme poverty, defined as living on less than $1 a day. More than 800 million go hungry each day. Over 100 million primary school-age children cannot go to school."The government in developing economies, while eager to achieve higher economic growth should put equal emphasis on solving the poverty issues. The International organizations such as World Bank and IMF, though have various programs on poverty, have failed to solve this poverty issues (because they are also involved in other development issues and not to mention sometimes involved in bailing-out activities). For the developed economy, the issue is more of inequality in income distribution. Taking US for example, the inequality is rising. The productivity is rising but real wages are declining. May be for US, the productivity-linked wage system should be implemented. Other than that, the US Government should implement more pro-welfare/social programs such uplifting education level, skills retraining and income generating activities (rather than spending huge amount on military). For Malaysia, the government should upgrade the livelihood of the poor through education, entrepreneurial skill enhancement and income redistribution programs.

Finally, I hope each and every one of us will, in our own capacity, try to address the poverty issue either in our own country or at global forums.

All man are equal
Man make man poor
Why poor in a rich world

Global Warming

We had a case study on global warming. there was heated argument between me, Steve (US) and Lucio (Australia) regarding the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) on global warming. Lucio was presenting the paper. He said that there are two school of thoughts, one, CO2 causes global warming and the other was there is no evidence to support that CO2 leads to global warming. He supported the second view and me the first. The whole argument arose when I questioned why Australia and US didn't sign the Kyoto protocol where industrialized nations ratified to reduce the CO2 emission levels. Japan agreed to reduce by 6% and European nations by 8% (below the 1990 levels) for the period 2008-2012. Lucio said that firstly, it's not proven CO2 causes global warming. Secondly, he said 'bloody hell' why the Indians and Chinese are not subjected to Kyoto protocol. They are polluting even greater with all the investment and industries moving over there.
My arguments, firstly, there is a correlation between CO2 and global warming. Simple example you go to a city with all the heavy traffic congestion and compare with a rural town where no traffic congestion. Compare the tempareture and the smoke levels between the two places. Secondly, the global warming through the 'greenhouse effect' had caused the global sea level to rise between 4 to 8 inches since 1900. The US is the largest emitter of CO2. I agree to the reasoning that developing countries should also be part of the Kyoto protocol and rules and regulation should be drafted for them to maintain certain minimum level of CO2 emission.
Concerted efforts should also be taken to combat the ignorance on the global warming issue. The low lying areas are going to face the consequences due to irresponsible activities of the large CO2 emitters. The developed and developing world should also jointly formulate measures to reduce CO2 emission levels. The green areas (lungs) of the world should be preserved. In addition, rich and poor countries can jointly conduct reasearches on global warming.
Gonna Quit Smoking begining Monday, 19/5/2008

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Club 61

In harvard we are in a group of eight participants sharing one common lounge attached with individual rooms which are so small, just the bed, bathroom and computer table. This according to Prof. Tushman to make u unattractive to stay in the room but spend most of your time with the group members in the common lounge. Lecture usually starts at 8 am and ends at 1.00 pm. , followed by your own readings of case studies in preparation of living group discussions in the evening starting 7.30 pm. Our group is placed on the sixth floor, suite 61. During the sixth week, after the group discussions at about 11.30 pm, the whole group went wild, drinking, shouting and dancing, which attracted other groups to join us. The whole partying ended 2.00 am and the next morning everybody went to the lecturer with red eyes and sleepy face. From then on, my group is known as Club 61 and they say "61 Rocks". They started calling me John Travolta after seeing me dancing when the video music Saturday Nite Fever was on.

My group members - Alec, Trish, me, Pedro Riaz and Karl standing behind are Steve and Lucio

My group is also quite unlucky. First, my mum passed away the second week. Then, week three, Steve was admittted to hospital for appendix or some say appendicitis operation. Week seven, Riaz was admitted to hospital for knee operation after injuring himself during a basketball game. This is my final week (week eight) - most of the participants are preparing to go home. Graduation day is on 23 May 2008.

Longlasting Friendship CLUB 61